PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES UNDER DROUGHT STRESS IN ARID ZONE OF THAL

Authors

  • A HUSSAIN Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • ZU ABIDEEN Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • M USAMA Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • K NAHEED Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • M KAREEM Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • A RAFIQUE Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author

Keywords:

Phenotypic Characterization, Arid, drought, chickpea

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is the second most important legume crop in terms of area and third in terms of production after beans and peas worldwide. It belongs to the Fabaceae family. It is a good source of quality protein.  Along with proteins, it is rich in fiber and minerals (phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, iron, and zinc) and vitamins. The yield of chickpeas is less due to the shortage of water. The present study aimed to analyze seven chickpea genotypes for identifying resistant/tolerant genotypes against drought, which could be directly introduced as commercial varieties and used for future breeding for resistance against drought in Thal Region. The experimental treatments included seven chickpea genotypes. A randomized complete block design was used for experimentation. The experiment was replicated three times and laid down in the experimental area with complete randomization. There were three blocks: one controlled, the second was semi-drought, and the third was drought. Statistical data analysis demonstrated that all the chickpea genotypes had significant differences for all recorded traits. According to the results, two varieties (TG-1620 and TGX-228) are tolerant to drought stress. These two varieties perform well in the biological yield.  Therefore, these genotypes can be used as germplasm in further breeding programs to develop drought-tolerant genotypes in chickpea.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rajeev K Varshney, Chi Song, Rachit K Saxena, Sarwar Azam, Sheng Yu, Andrew G Sharpe, Steven Cannon, Jongmin Baek, Benjamin D Rosen, Bunyamin Tar'an, Teresa Millan, Xudong Zhang, Larissa D Ramsay, Aiko Iwata, Ying Wang, William Nelson, Andrew D Farmer, Pooran M Gaur, Carol Soderlund, R Varma Penmetsa, Chunyan Xu, Arvind K Bharti, Weiming He, Peter Winter, Shancen Zhao, James K Hane, Noelia Carrasquilla-Garcia, Janet A Condie, Hari D Upadhyaya, Ming-Cheng Luo, Mahendar Thudi, C L L Gowda, Narendra P Singh, Judith Lichtenzveig, Krishna K Gali, Josefa Rubio, N Nadarajan, Kailash C Bansal, Xun Xu, David Edwards, Gengyun Zhang, Guenter Kahl, Juan Gil, Karam B Singh, Swapan K Datta, Scott A Jackson, Jun Wang & Douglas R Cook, Draft Genome sequence of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) provides a resource for trait improvement, Nature Biotechnology volume 31, pages240–246 (2013)

Global wheat production from 2011/2012 to 2021/2022 (in million metric tons) production volume worldwide 2011/2012-2021/22, M. Shahbandeh, Jan 31, 2022

India Samite*, Subhash Sharma, Ravinder Sharma, and Ankit Pathania, Trends in Area, Production, Productivity and Trade of Chickpea in, Economic Affairs, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 261-265, June 2020

Vegetative and reproductive growth of salt-stressed chickpea are carbon-limited: sucrose infusion at the reproductive stage improves salt tolerance.

Khan1,2, Kadambot H.M. Siddique2 and Timothy D. Colmer1,2, Vegetative and reproductive growth of salt-stressed chickpea are carbon-limited: sucrose infusion at the reproductive stage improves salt tole Journal of Experimental Botany, Journal of Experimental Botany, Vol. 68, No. 8

Gunes A, A. Inal, M. S. Adak, E. G. Bagci, N. Cicek, and F. Eraslan, Effect of Drought Stress Implemented at Pre- or Post-Anthesis Stage on Some Physiological Parameters as Screening Criteriain Chickpea Cultivars, SSN 1021-4437, Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2008, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 59–67. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2008.

Alice Kosgei, 1* Paul Kimurto2, Pooran Gaur3, Martin Yeboah4, Samuel Offei4 and Eric Danquah4, Farmers' Perception on Production Constraints, Trait Preference and Variety Selection of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in Kenya, September 2021 Vol. 5, No. 9

M. A. Vishnyakovaa, *, M. O. Burlyaevaa, S. V. Bulyntsevb, I. V. Seferovaa, E. S. Plekhanovac, and S. V. Nuzhdind, Phenotypic Diversity of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Landraces Accumulated in the Vavilov Collection from the Centersof the Crop’s Origin, ISSN 2079-0597, Russian Journal of Genetics: Applied Research, 2017, Vol. 7, No. 7, pp. 763–772.

Ali Akbar Mahmodi1, Ali Saeed2, Masood Kamel3, and R. S. Malhotra, Indian J. Study on chickpea drought tolerance lines under dryland condition of IranSayyed Hossain Sabaghpour, Crop Science, 1(1-2): 70-73 (2006)

Agbede, T.M., T.O. Oladitan, S.A. Alagha, A.O. Ojomo and M.O. Ale. 2010. “Comparative evaluation of poultry manure and NPK fertilizer on soil physical and chemical properties, leaf nutrient concentrations, growth and yield of yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir) in southwestern Nigeria”. World J. Agric. Sci. 6(5): 540-546.

Singh, B., Y. Singh, M.S. Maskina and O.P. Meelu. 1997. “The value of poultry manure for wetland rice grown in rotation with wheat”. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 47: 243- 250.

Mian, M.I.A., M.A. Rouf, M.A. Rashid, M.A. Mazid and M. Eaqub. 1985. “Residual effects of triple super phosphate (TSP) and farmyard manure (FYM) under renewed application of urea on the yield of crops and some chemical properties of the soil”. Bangladesh J. Agric. Sci. 10(2): 99-109.

Khaliq, A., M.K. Abbasi and T. Hussain. 2006. “Effects of integrated use of organic and inorganic nutrient sources with effective microorganisms (EM) on seed cotton yield in Pakistan”. Bioresour. Technol. 7(8): 967-972.

Chatha, T.H. 2005. “Phosphorus adsorption as described by Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherms in relation to plant growth under rainfed conditions”. Ph. D. Thesis. PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Barzegar, A.R., A. Yousefi and A. Daryashenas. 2002. “The effect of addition of different amounts and types of organic materials on soil physical properties and yield of wheat”. Plant Soil 247: 295–301

Dexter, A.R. 1988. “Advances in characterization of soil structure”. Soil Till. Res. 11: 199- 238.

Nelson, P.N. and J.M. Oades. 1998. “Organic matter, sodicity, and soil structure. In Sodic Soils”. Eds. M E Sumner and R Naidu. Oxford University Press, New York. pp. 51-75.

Barzegar, A.R., A. Yousefi and A. Daryashenas. 2002. “The effect of addition of different amounts and types of organic materials on soil physical properties and yield of wheat”. Plant Soil 247: 295–301.

Channabasanagowda, N.K., B. Patil, B.N. Patil, J.S. Awaknavar, B.T. Ninganur and R. Hunje. 2008. “Effect of organic manures on growth, seed yield and quality of wheat”. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 21(3): 366-368.

Gills, K.S. 2003. “Residual effects of hog and cattle manure on wheat yield”. Annual Report.

Hussain, T. 2001. “Manures and organic wastes”. In: Soil Science, 2nd Ed. National Book Foundation, Islamabad. pp. 387-403

Grant, P.M. 1967. “The fertility of sandveld soil under continuous cultivation. Part I. The effect of manure and nitrogen fertilizers on the nitrogen status of the soil”. Rhod. Zamb. Mal. J. Agric. Res. 5: 71-79.

Somda, Z.C., J.M. Powell, S. Fernandez-Rivera and J. Reed. 1995. “Feed factors affecting nutrient excretion by ruminants and fall of nutrients when applied to soil”. & J.M. Powell, S. Fernandez-Rivera, T.O. Williams, C. Renard (eds.), “Livestock and Sustainable Nutrient Cycling in Mixed Farming Systems of Sub-Saharan Africa”. ILCA, Addis Abbaba, Ethiopia. pp. 227-246.

Mafongoya, P.L., P. Barak and J.D. Reed. 2000. “Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization of tree leaves and manure”. Biol. Fert. Soils 30: 298-305.

Abdul Basir, Zahir Shah, Mohammad Naeem, Jehan Bakht and Zafar Hayat Khan. 2008 “Effect of Phosphorus and Farmyard Manure on Agronomic Traits of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Sarhad J. Agric. Vol.24, No.4.

Seval E., Ipekesen, S., Basdemir, F., Tunc, M., Bicer, B.T. 2020. “Effect of different fertilizer forms on yield and yield components of chickpea varieties”. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Food Sci., 4(2), 209-215

Verma and Panyang, 2022. "Effect of different combinations of livestock waste and agricultural wastes as growing media on roots of marigold cutting" College of Agriculture, Raipur's Poly home of Tissue Culture Lab.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-07

How to Cite

HUSSAIN, A., ABIDEEN, Z., USAMA, M., NAHEED, K., KAREEM, M., & RAFIQUE, A. (2022). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CHICKPEA GENOTYPES UNDER DROUGHT STRESS IN ARID ZONE OF THAL. Journal of Physical, Biomedical and Biological Sciences, 2022(1), 4. https://jpbab.com/index.php/home/article/view/4

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.