IDENTIFICATION OF BETTER PARENTS FOR QUALITY AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING TRAITS IN TOMATO USING LINE × TESTER ANALYSIS

Authors

  • M USAMA Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • A HUSSAIN Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • A RAFIQUE Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • K NAHEED Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • M KAREEM Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author
  • Z HUSSAIN Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, P.O BOX. 54590, Lahore, Pakistan Author

Keywords:

Tomato, GCA, SCA, Heterosis

Abstract

The production of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is hampered by postharvest losses, a major issue. Various methods have been employed to increase tomatoes' quality, yield, and shelf life, and ripening mutants is one of them. In 2019, an investigation was conducted at the Experimental Farm of the Vegetable Research Institute, Faisalabad, to explore tomatoes' combining ability and heterosis through a line x tester cross. This research aimed to create nine hybrids by crossing commercially grown tomato varieties (Nagina, Lyp. No. 1, and H-24) with ripening tomato mutants (88512, Titano, and Pakit) using the Line × Tester mating design. When stored one of the hybrids (88512 x H-24) showed an extended shelf life of up to 40 days. Analysis of variance indicated that non-additive gene action was predominant in all traits, with significant differences between parents and hybrids in terms of GCA and SCA effects. ‘88512’ and ‘H-24’ were the best general combiners for fruit-keeping quality, and they may be used as donors in breeding programs. The cross between ‘88512’ and ‘H-24’ was identified as a valuable combiner for improving postharvest shelf life in tomato breeding programs. The crosses ‘88512 × H-24’ and ‘Pakit × H-24’ exhibited the highest heterotic effects for fruit-keeping quality and yield per plant, respectively. The mean values of genetic parameters in parents and F1 showed that the cross between ‘H-24’ and the ripening mutant ‘88512’ resulted in high shelf life and good fruit quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aaliya, K., Qamar, Z., Ahmad, N.I., Ali, Q., Munim, F.A., & Husnain, T. (2016). Transformation, evaluation of gtgene and multivariate genetic analysis for morpho-physiological and yield attributing traits in zea mays. Genetika, 48(1), 423-433.

Ahsan, M., Farooq, A., Khaliq, I., Ali, Q., Aslam, M., & Kashif, M. (2013). Inheritance of various yield contributing traits in maize (zea mays l.) At low moisture condition. African journal of agricultural research, 8(4), 413-420.

Allard, R. W. (1960). Principles of plant breeding. John Willey and Sons. Inc. New York, 485.

Ali, Q., Ahsan, M., Ali, F., Aslam, M., Khan, N. H., Manzoor, M., ... & Muhammad, S. (2013). Heritability, heterosis and heterobeltiosis studies for morphological traits of maize (Zea mays L.) Seedlings. Advancements in life sciences, 1(1): 52-63.

Ali, Q., Ahsan, M., Kanwal, N., Ali, F., Ali, A., Ahmed, W., ... & Saleem, M. (2016). Screening for drought tolerance: comparison of maize hybrids under water deficit condition. Advancements in Life Sciences, 3(2), 51-58.

Ali, Q., Ali, A., Ahsan, M., Nasir, I. A., Abbas, H. G., & Ashraf, M. A. (2014A). Line × Tester analysis for morpho-physiological traits of Zea mays L seedlings. Advancements in life Sciences, 1(4), 242-253.

Ali, Q., Ali, A., Awan, M.F., Tariq, M., Ali, S., Samiullah, T.R., ... & Hussain, T. (2014b). Combining ability analysis for various physiological, grain yield and quality traits of Zea mays L. Life sci j, 11(8s), 540-551.

Bhatt, R.P.; V.R. Biswas and N. Kumar (2001). Heterosis, combining ability and genetics for vitamin C, total soluble solids and yield in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) at 1700 m altitude. J. Agric., Sci., Cambridge, 137: 71-75.

Chen, J., Zhou, H., Xie, W., Xia, D., Gao, G., Zhang, Q., Wang, G., Lian, X., Xiao, J., & He, Y. (2019). Genome‐wide association analyses reveal the genetic basis of combining ability in rice. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 17(11), 2211–2222.

Choudhary B, Punia RS, Sangha HS (1965). Manifestation of hybrid vigour in F1 and its correlation in F2 generation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Indian J. Hort. 22: 52-59.

Dawa, Kawther K., I.M EL-Ghareeb and I. Abd E-HAJ (2007). the utilization of heterosis in the breeding of tomato. J. Agric. Sci. Mansoura Univ., 32 (3): 2405-2114.

FAO Statistical databases (2019). available online: www.fao.org

Farooq, J., Khaliq, I., Ali, M.A., Kashif, M., Rehman, A. U., Naveed, M., ... & Farooq, A. (2011). Inheritance pattern of yield attributes in spring wheat at grain filling stage under different temperature regimes. Australian journal of crop science, 5(13), 1745-1753.

Fatima, S., Cheema, K., Shafiq, M., Manzoor, M., Ali, Q., Haider, M., & Shahid, M. (2023). the genome-wide bioinformatics analysis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase (acs), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase (aco) and ethylene overproducer 1 (eto1) gene family of Fragaria vesca (woodland strawberry). bulletin of biological and allied sciences research, 2023(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.54112/bbasr.v2023i1.38

Hannan, M.M., Ahmed, M.B., Razvy, M.A., Karim, R., Khatum, M., Hayder, A., Hussain, M., Roy. U.K. (2007) heterosis and correlation of yield and yield components in tomato. am-eurasian j. sci. res. 2(2): 46-150.

Kadam, D.E., Patil, F.B., Bhor, T.J., & Harer, P.N. (2000). Line× tester analysis in sweet sorghum hybrids. Journal of maharashtra agricultural universities, 25(3), 318-319.

Kaushik, S.K., Tomar, D.S., & Dixit, A.K. (2011). Genetics of fruit yield and it's contributing characters in tomato (Solanum lycopersicom). Journal Of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development, 3(10), 209.

Kempthorne, O. (1957). An Introduction To Genetic Statistics.

Kumar, S., Banerjee, M.K., & Partap, P.S. (1995). Studies on heterosis for various characters in tomato. Haryana journal of horticultural sciences, 24, 54-54.

Mondal, C., S. Sarkar and P. Hazara (2009). Line x Tester analysis of combining ability in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). J. crop and Weed 5 (1): 53-57.

Narasimhamurthy, Y.K., & Gowda, P.H.R. (2013). Line × tester analysis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum l.): identification of superior parents for fruit quality and yield-attributing traits. International Journal of Plant Breeding, 7(1), 50-54.

Nasrin, T., Molla, M., Hossaen, M.A., Alam, M., & Yasmin, L. (2009). Effect of postharvest treatments on shelf life and quality of tomato. Bangladesh journal of agricultural research, 33(4), 579–585. Https://doi.org/10.3329/bjar.v33i4.2291

Shalaby, T.A. (2012). Line× Tester Analysis For Combining Ability And Heterosis In Tomato Under Late Summer Season Conditions. Journal of Plant Production 3(11): 2857-2865.

Sprague, G.F., & Tatum, L.A. (1942). General vs. Specific combining ability in single crosses of corn 1. Agronomy journal, 34(10), 923-932.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-10

How to Cite

USAMA, M., HUSSAIN, A., RAFIQUE, A., NAHEED, K., KAREEM, M., & HUSSAIN, Z. (2022). IDENTIFICATION OF BETTER PARENTS FOR QUALITY AND YIELD ATTRIBUTING TRAITS IN TOMATO USING LINE × TESTER ANALYSIS. Journal of Physical, Biomedical and Biological Sciences, 2022(1), 2. https://jpbab.com/index.php/home/article/view/2